- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
July 2011 Archives
What energy and environment policies are at stake in the spending and debt debates now dominating Washington?
This week, the House will debate its FY2012 EPA/Interior spending bill. That measure slashes funding for both the Environmental Protection Agency and the Interior Department, and includes myriad policy riders that gut environmental regulations, ranging from President Obama's contentious climate-change rules to public-lands protection. Meanwhile, Congress and the administration remain mired in the debt-ceiling debate, which is expected to come to a head this week.
What are the implications of the House EPA/Interior spending bill? What are some of the best and worst parts of that legislation? What role will energy and environment issues play in the overall debt-ceiling talks?
13 responses: Paul Sullivan, Lance Brown, Barry Russell, Matthew Garrington, Amy Harder, Rodger Schlickeisen, Gene Karpinski, Carl Pope, Brent Erickson, David Holt, Thomas J. Pyle, Bob Bendick, William O'Keefe
What are the future prospects for coal-powered electricity?
Coal generates nearly half of the United States' electricity, and it has historically been this nation's most dominant base power. But the policy and economic landscape is changing. Tougher environmental standards are prompting utilities to question their investments in efficient technology and some are shifting to natural gas, a cleaner fossil fuel than coal. One of the nation's biggest coal companies, American Electric Power, announced last week that it was shelving plans to develop "clean coal" technology amid an uncertain climate policy and a still-weak economy. That technology, known as carbon capture and sequestration, is considered the industry's best chance to ensure it continues to thrive in a policy landscape that controls carbon pollution. Meanwhile, U.S. coal exports to Asia are skyrocketing as China and India have seemingly insatiable appetites for coal-fired energy.
What are the biggest challenges facing the coal industry? What policies can Congress and President Obama support that could help the industry power the country with a smaller carbon footprint? Should policymakers try harder at weaning the country off of coal completely?
10 responses: Amy Harder, Amy Harder, Lance Brown, Amy Harder, Ned Helme, Michael Brune, Richard Revesz, Conrad Schneider, Hal Quinn, William O'Keefe
Germany announced in May it will stop using nuclear power, in the wake of Japan's Fukushima Daiichi disaster. The French Senate recently voted to ban hydraulic fracturing, a controversial way to extract natural gas.
What lessons can the United States learn from these countries' decisions? National news bears out the different perspectives: New Jersey recently announced a ban on fracking, while New York lifted its unofficial ban on the extraction method. No new nuclear power plants have been built in the U.S. in 30 years, but existing plants are coming under more intense scrutiny in the wake of Japan's crisis.
Should the U.S. follow other nations' lead in prohibiting certain types of energies and technologies because of their environmental and health risks? What can President Obama and Congress do to minimize these risks associated with energy production?
13 responses: Amy Harder, Cal Dooley, Thomas J. Pyle, Amy Harder, Guy Morgan, Victor Gilinsky, Jennifer Morgan, Allen Schaeffer, Marvin Fertel, Henry Derwent, David Holt, Jacqueline Savitz, William O'Keefe
Does global warming increase the risk of extreme weather?
Environmentalists and scientists are re-examining that possible link in light of the wild weather the United States has seen so far in 2011, including heat waves, tornadoes, and wildfires. A similar debate was prompted last year by extreme weather throughout the world, including wildfires in Russia and floods in Pakistan.
When considered collectively, what do these extreme weather events mean for the climate change debate? Should scientists study these connections further - examining, for example, whether tornadoes are linked to climate change? How could this debate affect the arguments put forth by skeptics that global warming is not occurring?
13 responses: Richard Revesz, Rodger Schlickeisen, Eric Haxthausen, Kevin S. Curtis, Rep. Earl Blumenauer, D-Ore., David E. Hunter, Gene Karpinski, Amy Harder, Olga Belogolova, Eileen Claussen, Carl Pope, Amy Harder, William O'Keefe
