National Journal.com

nationaljournal.com > Expert Blogs > Energy & Environment

NationalJournal.com Home Energy & Environment Experts Home Energy & Environment Home

National Journal's Energy & Environment

Contributor

Jon A. Anda, Executive-in-Residence Fuqua School of Business, Visiting Fellow Nicholas Institute

Biography provided by participant

Anda recently joined Duke University to work on issues related to carbon financial markets. He was previously president of the Environmental Markets Network, an organization set up within the Environmental Defense Fund to build support in the financial community for market-based solutions to climate change.

Anda joined EDF in early 2007, after serving as a vice chairman of Morgan Stanley. During his 20 year career at Morgan Stanley, he led a number of business units including Global Capital Markets, Corporate Finance, Equity Capital Markets, Investment Banking Asia, and Institutional Equities Asia. After joining the firm in 1986, he was named managing director in 1992 while serving as a generalist investment banker in the firm’s Chicago office. Anda has worked with a wide range of clients including GE, Google, The Peoples Republic of China, and The Chicago Mercantile Exchange.

Anda graduated from the University of Illinois in 1979 and received his MBA from Northwestern University, Kellogg Graduate School of Management in 1980. After business school, he worked in Project Finance at Continental Illinois National Bank where he financed alternative energy projects during the last energy boom. Anda is a member of the Board of Trustees of the Asia Society, where he has funded (and is working actively on) the new “Initiative for U.S. - China Cooperation on Energy and Climate”. He also serves on the President’s Advisory Council of EDF.

Recent Responses

November 9, 2009 07:36 AM

RE: Should Congress Split Up Energy And Cap-And-Trade?

Energy Policy More Complicated Climate should go first for 3 reasons: 1) coincidence with clean domestic energy, 2) international credibility, and 3) inherent simplicity. Simple cap and trade might be something as follows: 83% cut by 2050 from large electric & industrial sources - with 2/3 to 3/4 auctioned and free pro-rata allocation (to emitters) in the early years. Energy policy is more complicated (note: 1426 pages of HR2454 avoided most real energy decisions). There should be 3 core components to an energy bill: transportation policy & fuel taxes, electric power supply, and electric power distribution (including incentives for utility…  Read more

October 15, 2009 08:04 AM

RE: Kerry-Boxer: Worth The Wait?

Kerry-Graham Pillars  For the 4 pillars of Kerry-Graham - revitalized nuclear, the Saudi Arabia of clean coal, border taxes, and price collars - the beauty is in the details.  For the first two, the question is how much base load capacity do we really need if financial incentives are changed from rate base to demand management?  For the third, the concept of a globally coordinated border tax might avoid the trade war that a unilateral one risks.  But the fourth pillar is where details matter the most - the dynamic process of a co2 market driving investment to find the…  Read more

October 5, 2009 09:17 AM

RE: Should We Nix Cap-And-Trade?

Updated at 10:32 a.m. on Oct. 5.  Fair question.  Does society want a cap on emissions or a cap on policy cost?  If you view climate risk as a fat-tail risk of catastrophic consequences then capping emissions is better.  Capping emissions ensures that low-carbon investments get made and that (with global participation) atmospheric concentrations of co2 decline.  In theory, a variable carbon tax could do the same thing - but the reality of that is unlikely.   Nonetheless, why not use both?  Cap and trade for power plants and large industrial sources makes imminent sense (as Europe has done).  I…  Read more
Advertisement
Advertisement

Stay Connected

Archives

Special Guest Moderators

Contributors

Add Energy/Enviro Experts To Your Site

Blogs

Experts

Experts: Health Care

Troublesome Directions

Latest response: Robert GreensteinNovember 20, 2009 3:38 pm