National Journal.com

nationaljournal.com > Expert Blogs > Energy & Environment

NationalJournal.com Home Energy & Environment Experts Home Energy & Environment Home

National Journal's Energy & Environment

Contributor

Richard Revesz, Dean, New York University School of Law

Biography provided by participant

Richard Revesz is Dean and Lawrence King Professor of Law at New York University School of Law and one of the nation’s leading voices in the fields of environmental and regulatory law and policy. He has published more than 50 articles and books on environmental and administrative law. His work on issues of federalism and environmental regulation, the valuation of human life and the use of cost-benefit analysis, and the design of liability rules for environmental protection has set the agenda for environmental law scholars for the past decade. After writing his most recent book, Retaking Rationality: How Cost-Benefit Analysis Can Better Protect the Environment and Our Health (Oxford University Press, 2008), with co-author Michael Livermore he founded the Institute for Policy Integrity to promote the idea that the economic analysis of the law is not inherently biased towards conservative results, but can support a more protective approach to environmental and public health policy.

Revesz graduated summa cum laude in Civil Engineering and Public Affairs from Princeton University, received an M.S. in Civil Engineering from MIT, and was awarded his J.D. by Yale Law School, where he was the Editor-in-Chief of the Yale Law Journal. Following judicial clerkships with Chief Judge Wilfred Feinberg of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and Justice Thurgood Marshall of the Supreme Court of the United States, Revesz joined the NYU Law faculty in 1985, received tenure in 1990, and was appointed dean in 2002.

Recent Responses

September 25, 2009 04:28 PM

RE: Is Uncle Sam On Right Track On Fuel Efficiency?

Since EPA is legally bound to regulate vehicle fuel emissions, their new standards are a reasonable step. But it is an example of the kinds of command-and-control regulations that should be used only sparingly to address climate change.  Since the Supreme Court ruled in Massachusetts v. EPA that the agency must regulate greenhouse gases two years ago, legal petitions have been piling up on the Administrator’s desk. For example, a number of states and environmental organizations have petitioned the EPA to regulate GHG emissions from airplanes, ships, and nonroad vehicles. These petitions will require a response. But if EPA begins to address each complaint…  Read more
Advertisement
Advertisement

Stay Connected

Archives

Special Guest Moderators

Contributors

Add Energy/Enviro Experts To Your Site

Blogs

Hotline On Call

The Sunday Showdown

November 22, 2009 3:13 pm
Pollster

A Big Fat 'Outlier'

November 22, 2009 10:27 am

Experts

Experts: Health Care

Troublesome Directions

Latest response: Robert GreensteinNovember 20, 2009 3:38 pm