National Journal.com

nationaljournal.com > Expert Blogs > Energy & Environment

NationalJournal.com Home Energy & Environment Experts Home Energy & Environment Home

National Journal's Energy & Environment

Contributor

Rob Stavins, Business and Government Professor; Director, Harvard Environmental Economics Program Harvard's Kennedy School of Government

Biography provided by participant

Stavins holds a variety of posts at Harvard. He is a business and government professor, serves as director of the Harvard Environmental Economics Program, and is co-director of the Harvard Project on International Climate Agreements. He is also chairman of the Environment and Natural Resources Faculty Group.

Stavins is a university fellow at Resources for the Future, a research associate of the National Bureau of Economic Research, the editor of the Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, and a member of the Board of Directors of Resources for the Future and the Board of Academic Advisors of the AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies. He is also on the editorial boards of Resource and Energy Economics, Environmental Economics Abstracts, B.E. Journals of Economic Analysis & Policy, and Economic Issues and is an editor of the Journal of Wine Economics. He served as a lead author of the second and third assessment reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Stavins directed Project 88, a bi-partisan effort co-chaired by former Sen. Timothy Wirth and the late Sen. John Heinz, to develop innovative approaches to environmental and resource problems. Prior to coming to Harvard, Stavins was a staff economist at the Environmental Defense Fund. He holds a B.A. from Northwestern University, an M.S. in agricultural economics from Cornell, and a Ph.D. in economics from Harvard.

Recent Responses

October 8, 2009 07:11 AM

RE: Should We Nix Cap-And-Trade?

I would like to comment briefly on Senator Murkowski's second message in this conversation, which begins "Both the Waxman-Markey and Kerry-Boxer climate bills..." and concludes "... it's a threshold question."  In this second message, the Senator's key message is that it is important not to load down a carbon pricing policy -- such as a cap-and-trade system -- with lots of additional, regulatory policies "which could reduce the efficiency of a carbon market."  I completely agree.  As I have written about elsewhere, the supplemental regulatory parts of the Waxman-Markey bill (and for that matter, the developing Senate legislation) will --…  Read more

October 5, 2009 07:38 AM

RE: Should We Nix Cap-And-Trade?

Cap-and-Trade versus the Alternatives Let’s credit Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) for raising questions about the viability of cap-and-trade versus other approaches for the United States to employ in addressing CO2 and other greenhouse gas emissions linked with global climate change. Senator Murkowski claims that only one approach – cap-and-trade – has received significant attention in the Congress. Let’s put aside for the moment the reality that most of the 1,428 pages of H.R. 2454 – the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (otherwise known as the Waxman-Markey bill) – is not about cap-and-trade at all, but about a…  Read more
Advertisement
Advertisement

Stay Connected

Archives

Special Guest Moderators

Contributors

Add Energy/Enviro Experts To Your Site

Blogs

Pollster

A Big Fat 'Outlier'

November 22, 2009 10:27 am

Experts

Experts: Health Care

Troublesome Directions

Latest response: Robert GreensteinNovember 20, 2009 3:38 pm